Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade dependencies #461

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 4, 2024
Merged

Upgrade dependencies #461

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 4, 2024

Conversation

Danielius1922
Copy link
Member

@Danielius1922 Danielius1922 commented Apr 4, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated linter settings and added new linters for improved code quality checks.
  • Refactor
    • Enhanced performance by preallocating memory in various functions.
    • Updated error handling and test assertions for consistency and clarity.
  • Documentation
    • Added comments to suppress linting for nested if statements in specific methods.

Direct:
github.com/plgd-dev/go-coap/v3 v3.3.4-0.20240404104253-8d54d1cdfc79
google.golang.org/grpc v1.63.0

Indirect:
golang.org/x/net v0.23.0
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Walkthrough

This update streamlines the project's linting configurations and enhances code quality checks across several files. It involves the removal, update, and addition of various linters, alongside specific code optimizations like preallocating slices and refining error handling. These changes aim to improve performance and maintainability, ensuring the code adheres to higher standards of quality.

Changes

Files Summary
.golangci.yml Linting configurations updated, including removal and addition of linters.
bridge/resources/resource.go Added a comment to suppress linting for nested if statements.
client/core/discover.go, client/core/getDevice_test.go, client/getDevice.go, pkg/eventloop/..., pkg/security/generateCertificate/config.go Optimizations and assertion changes for improved performance and test reliability.
pkg/security/signer/signer.go Updated error handling in the Sign method for clarity and efficiency.

Possibly related issues

  • Dependency Dashboard hub#418: The update to linting configurations and the focus on improving code quality and performance could indirectly support the project's dependency management and update schedules. This PR's emphasis on code maintainability might align with the objectives of keeping dependencies up to date and ensuring the project adheres to current best practices.

Poem

In the land of code where the rabbits dwell,
Changes bloom, as stories they tell.
🌟 With linters tweaked and slices prealloc',
The code now swift, without a falter or stall.
Through loops and lines, the rabbit hops,
Crafting a garden where quality tops.
🚀 To the future, we bound, with code so bright,
Guided by stars in the deep, coding night.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Danielius1922 Danielius1922 marked this pull request as ready for review April 4, 2024 11:09
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
50.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 75%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 9

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 48efa09 and ab27cfe.
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • go.mod is excluded by !**/*.mod
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (8)
  • .golangci.yml (7 hunks)
  • bridge/resources/resource.go (1 hunks)
  • client/core/discover.go (1 hunks)
  • client/core/getDevice_test.go (2 hunks)
  • client/getDevice.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/eventloop/eventloop_internal_test.go (5 hunks)
  • pkg/security/generateCertificate/config.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/security/signer/signer.go (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (15)
pkg/security/signer/signer.go (1)

67-89: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [46-106]

Ensure the Sign method returns errors immediately upon occurrence, improving error handling clarity and maintainability.

client/core/discover.go (1)

126-126: Optimize memory allocation by initializing the out slice with a specific capacity, which can improve performance.

bridge/resources/resource.go (1)

275-275: Suppress linting for nested if statements using //nolint:nestif. Ensure this suppression is justified and documented, especially if it's due to unavoidable complexity.

client/getDevice.go (1)

122-122: Optimize memory allocation by initializing the devs slice with a specific capacity, which can improve performance.

.golangci.yml (10)

31-31: The removal of testifylint configuration aligns with the PR objectives to enhance code quality checks.


34-34: Updating dupword linter settings contributes to the goal of enforcing stricter code quality standards.


35-35: The adjustment to durationcheck linter settings is a positive change for improving code quality.


37-37: Updating errchkjson linter settings is beneficial for enhancing error handling practices.


69-69: Adding nakedret linter helps in maintaining code readability and reducing complexity.


70-70: The addition of nestif linter is a good practice for managing code complexity.


77-77: Preallocating memory by adding prealloc linter aligns with performance optimization goals.


126-126: Introducing testableexamples linter encourages the use of testable examples, enhancing code documentation and test coverage.


139-142: Excluding certain linters for test files is justified to allow for more complex test setups.


151-151: Allowing nestif in specific paths acknowledges the necessity of complexity in certain areas of the codebase.

pkg/security/generateCertificate/config.go (1)

296-296: The optimization to preallocate the ips slice based on the length of cfg.SubjectAlternativeName.IPAddresses is a good practice for improving memory allocation efficiency.

pkg/eventloop/eventloop_internal_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/eventloop/eventloop_internal_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/eventloop/eventloop_internal_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/eventloop/eventloop_internal_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
client/core/getDevice_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
client/core/getDevice_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
client/core/getDevice_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
client/core/getDevice_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
client/core/getDevice_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@Danielius1922 Danielius1922 merged commit b0552c0 into main Apr 4, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@Danielius1922 Danielius1922 deleted the adam/feature/update-deps branch April 4, 2024 11:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant